Tuesday, November 28, 2006
Further discussion
Thursday, June 23, 2005
Monogamy is there such a thing?
mo·nog·a·my: It doesn't matter how you say it, the definitions below, suggest theres room for a little too much manipulation, for a state which is meant to be inflexible. For example if one examines the Zoological definition below, one could conclude, that once they had finished their breeding cycle, they are free to move to a new relationship without violating an oath to be monogamous? This would in part explain why some change partners once the female enters menopause! On occasions where this occurs I question whether or not the female in question had an equal understanding of monogamy, perhaps she had a more conventional view "The practice of marrying only once in a life time." Of course this doesn't clarify whether monogamy covers all sexual experiences, for example for some monogamy only begins at marriage, sexual congress prior to marriage does not preclude one from qualifying for a monagamous lifetime badge of honour. Still again there are those who prefer the first definition offered below. The practice or condition of having a single sexual partner during a period of time. The practice or condition of being married to only one person at a time. The practice of marrying only once in a lifetime. Zoology. The condition of having only one mate during a breeding season or during the breeding life of a pair. |